AI Act – what impact will it have on devices incorporating artificial intelligence systems?
Do you manufacture devices incorporating artificial intelligence systems and wonder how the newly published AI Act will impact you? Read the rest of this article 😉
The key message to remember: The MD and IVD Regulations continue to drive DM/IVDs incorporating AI!
-
-
-
- The AI Act is based on a ‘horizontal’ approach, not specific to a particular sector of activity.
- Unlike MDR/IVDR, which are based on a ‘vertical’ sectoral approach to regulation, specific to a type of product.
-
-
This means that, for a device incorporating an AI system :
-
-
-
- AI-specific aspects and requirements are defined by the AI Act
- The overall safety of the final product is covered by the MDR/IVDR
- The compliance of AI systems with the requirements of the AI Act will be assessed as part of the conformity assessment already provided for by the MDR/IVDR
-
-
As with the MDR/IVDR, the AI Act classification is based on the product’s level of risk:
Remember that devices incorporating an AI system (except Class I MD and Class A IVD) are automatically classified as high-risk AI systems under the AI Act, regardless of their risk class under the MDR/IVDR. This high-risk classification leads to a systematic review of the technical documentation during the conformity assessment.
However, there are 2 exceptions:
-
-
-
- class I medical devices (which are not sterile, have no measuring function and are not reusable surgical instruments) and non-sterile class A IVD
- legacy devices
-
- which are not high-risk AI systems and are not subject to a conformity assessment procedure under the AI Act.
- But which must still apply the requirements of Title IV of the AI Act: the obligation to be transparent with data subjects about the fact that they are interacting with an AI system, unless it is obvious.
-
-
-
Many requirements are common to both texts (MDR/IVDR and AI Act).
But… there are also a few new features that will impact manufacturers of devices incorporating AIS, including:
-
-
-
- Data governance: High-risk AIS must be developed using high-quality datasets for learning, validation and testing.
- Human control: High-risk AIS must be designed to allow humans to supervise them effectively using appropriate human-machine interface tools.
- Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity: which must be maintained throughout the lifecycle of high-risk AIS.
-
-
And finally, here are the application dates to remember, depending on the class of device:
If you would like to find out more:
-
-
-
- A webinar on the relationship between the AI Act and the MDR/IVDR was recently hosted by nexialist.
- Check out our podcasts.
- Our section about AI with all regulatory texts, standards, or guides on an international scale.
-
-
En savoir plus sur le monde du DM & DMDIV
Nos articles récents
USA : Guidance on the Refuse to Accept Policy for 510(k)s
The FDA published « Refuse to Accept Policy for 510(k)s » in August 2015, a new guidance document for medical device manufacturers. It aims at helping manufacturers of class II MD (mainly), to properly prepare and submit their 510(k) submissions to get approval in the...
GUDID Open for Implant/Life Supporting/Life Sustaining Device Labelers on January 26th, 2015
With the deadline for UDI compliance quickly approaching (Sept 2015 or Sept 2016 according to the FDA extension list), the FDA began accepting GUDID account requests from labelers of implantable, life-supporting, and life-sustaining medical devices on January 26,...
New 2014/53/EU directive
The new RED directive about radio-electric equipment was published. It will be mandatory from June 2016. The new 2014/53/EU directive, of the European Parliament and of the Council, of the 16th of April 2014, defines the marketing rules for radio-electric equipment...
0 Comments